I said it a while ago but the initial release should have been this year, at least qualitatively speaking. My initial view of CK3 was less positive than it is now. What's even the point anymore? In some respects, I don't think they've made a decent game since Airfix Dogfighter, and they can only take half the credit for that. I really do feel we should give this careful thought - I think I speak for everyone here when I say we'd all be better off arguing about Paradox games than playing them. This would solve myriad issues together casual players (and with them, casual games) would disappear, the average IQ of forum members would increase as we see more posts about Trajan and fewer referencing 4chan memes, and tedious YouTube personalities would be phased out in favor of densely-written narrative AARs that have almost nothing to do with the game whose forum they're posted in. ![]() We must do our best to reduce both Paradox's profits and player base whilst simultaneously increasing the difficulty and complexity of their games. Membership could be maintained through a series of tests (let's call them 'ordeals') varying from general knowledge, to Paradox employee history, to reciting specific details of Peter Ebbesen AARs from the early 2000s. You know who I'm talking about - they plague the OT forum and deal in absolutes.Ģ) Paradox forums should be invite-only, and limited to a one-in, one-out 'elite' membership of a fixed number of accounts - something like the Order of the Garter, but for Byzantophiles and Austria-Hungary enthusiasts. ![]() Click to expand.You raise some valid issues, and ones which lend themselves to obvious solutions:ġ) Paradox games should require a registered forum account, proof of purchase, and a higher education degree ideally something in the humanities or liberal arts, as STEM subjects attract awful, humorless people with ideas above their station.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |